الاختلاف في التعريفات الفقهية وأثره في الأحكام الشرعية عند الإمامية – عرض وتحليل

Rp-The difference in the jurisprudential definitions and it's impact on the legal rulings of the Imamiyah, presentation and analysis.pdf

Abstract
The research aims to show that the difference in the jurisprudential definitions has a great impact on changing the jurisprudential rulings of the Imamayh, and that the definitions were and still are the subject of disagreement and controversy among the jurists, and this difference in turn leads to the difference in the jurisprudential rulings issued by the scholarly jurist in the jurisprudential issue, and there is no doubt that The definition is of great importance, as through it the general and distinctive aspects of something are identified, and it is clarified accurately and highlighted from what else, just as a person is known by his name, characteristics, and characteristics that distinguish him, so the definition is in the sense of limiting or drawing, so every jurisprudential term is defined by the jurist and on the basis of this definition The ruling and the legal assignment are clear about it, so we see the first places of difference between the jurists starting from the jurisprudential definitions, and this studying came to answer the most important problems that were raised and are still being raised about the reasons for the difference of the Imami jurists in the same ruling, knowing that they are from one school of thought and their sources in deduction are one and their imams are one. And the narrations are the same circulating in the hands of everyone, so why the difference in the fatwa from one reference to another