التفسير الموضوعي والتفسير البنائي – موازنة وتحليل

Objective interpretation and structural interpretation Equilibration and analysis

Abstract
The research dealt with two types of interpretation, namely the objective interpretation and the structural interpretation, which appeared in the last century, based on important roots dating back to the early days of Islam . Each of them benefited from the great explanatory wealth represented in what we have in the hands of interpretations that took the ordinal fragmentary form
After studying and analyzing them on both the theoretical and practical sides, the research concluded to extract a set of assets, rules and sources on which each of the two interpretations was based and employed. All three have evidence and examples that reinforce what it goes to and the results it concludes
The first chapter, which was devoted to research on the origins of interpretation, and it appeared through the balance that the two interpretations share most of the principles of interpretation, as they deal with the blessed Qur’anic text as a divine revelation that has not been distorted and that its apparent meaning is an argument. They reconciled the explanatory sayings and preferred between the opposing ones , They differed in the purpose of believing in and adopting those principles. The objective interpretation was adopting these principles and proceeding from them to make the Holy Qur’an dominant over the human experience. The other thing that he sought was extracting is the Qur’anic vision of the various topics of life, while the constructivist interpretation was adopting those assets to prove the interdependence of the surah. The Qur’anic text and the unity of its construction and that its parts are organized according to miracle divine geometry .
As for the second chapter, which is devoted to the rules of objective and constructivist interpretation, we find participation and divergence also present, and that the rules of constructivist interpretation can be rules for objective interpretation ( detective ) seeking the unity of the blessed surah, and some of the rules of objective interpretation with its general title can be applied in constructivist interpretation and benefit from them in the process of revealing Allah’s will, however, there is what is specific to the objective interpretation towards the rule for the complete collection of the verses of the subject from all the Holy Qur’an in addition to the rule for the combination of exegetical opinions and what leads to it in the expansion of the meaning, they are from the characteristics of the objective interpretation in the manner shown by the detailed research .
As for the third chapter, it was about the sources of objective and constructive interpretation, and they participated in all the exegetical sources and that they presented the Holy Qur’an as the basic source on which they are based, but they differed in the amount of taking from those sources according to the purpose that each of them intended and the research space , while the structural revolves within the limits of the Qur’anic surah and rarely exceeds it, and the objective intends the significance and meaning, while the structural studied the surah semantic and aesthetically to prove the union of its parts and the coherence of its construction, and this matter was certainly reflected in the size and method of taking from some sources of interpretation .
The research concluded with a number of results, including the authenticity of these two types of interpretation and that they are the product of the origins, rules and sources of interpretation, and therefore their product is an argument that guides the purpose of Allah the Almighty, and that the interpretation of the Qur’an in the Qur’an is their pillar, just as decoding the overlap between objective and constructivist interpretation is by taking out the objective interpretation (the detective ) from the title the objective interpretation and its inclusion with the constructivist or finding a comprehensive title for them because staying with the objective is not appropriate, as it is much closer to the constructivist than it is related to objective interpretation in its general known sense .