الفكر النحويّ عند السيد الطباطبائي في الميزان: المنصوبات، والأدوات أمثلة

The grammatical thought of Sayyid Tabatabai in the balance of the postings, and the tools are two examples

Summaries:
Interpretation of the balance is very important in the seminary
lesson, and Sayyid Tabatabai is the owner of a private school in
Qur’anic exegesis, and I think that the reason for this is due to his
being diligent, as this book is studied at an advanced stage of study in
the scholarly seminary. He deserves in linguistic studies, except in
some letters that deal with it.
And I saw that these studies do not fulfill the linguistic efforts that
exist in the interpretation of the balance by Mr. To studies and
studies.
The term thinking is the first precursor in things, and when these
things mature in a person’s mind it is called thought, and the meaning
of thought is to use the mind in things to reach their knowledge.
Avicenna mentioned that thought is when a person’s unanimity
moves away from things present in his mind that are perceived, or
validated. It has a scientific or presumptive endorsement, status, or
acknowledgment of matters not present in it, and this transfer is not
without arrangement.
And the meaning of grammatical thought is the opinions that he said,
adopted, or defended, or the scientist commented on them negatively
or positively, whether these opinions are new or what other scholars
have said.
The researcher proceeded in writing this study according to the
descriptive explanatory method, and the nature of the research
required that it consist of two chapters, preceded by an introduction,
and followed by a conclusion.
The first chapter of the message was titled Positions, and it came in
two chapters, which dealt in the first chapter with the effects: the

accusative, the absolute, and the object, and in the second chapter of
the first chapter, the similarities with the effects were studied:
distinction, status, and exclusion.
The second chapter of the thesis included the study of tools, and it
came in two chapters, while the first chapter dealt with the tools that
perform the function of traction, namely: Ba, the lam, and who, and
the second chapter of the second chapter came under the title of nontraction tools, in which the tools were studied: If, And that, has, nor,
and what, and waw.
Sayyid Tabatabai was interpreting the Qur’an from his own view of
the context and the Qur’anic layout. That is why we find in his
interpretation accepting the rules set by the grammarians, provided
that they fit the context required by the Qur’anic text.
Sayyid Tabatabai was not alone in relying on the context and the
denominator in his interpretation. Rather, this is present among
others, but it became clear to him clearly. He gave him special
attention and great care in grammar guidance.
The researcher finds in Sayyid al-Tabatabai’s interpretation a special
approach to accepting and rejecting opinions, and this is because he is
mujtahid, and for this we find that he presents the views of the
commentators, discusses them between acceptance and rejection and
comments on some of them, and sometimes he is quoted in a simple
manner, or a Muslim opinion without commenting on it Negatively,
not positively.
Al-Sayyid al-Tabataba’i was singled out for ijtihadi views in the field of
grammar that no one of the commentators and grammarians said,
i.e., he has an independent approach to studying grammatical issues
in the interpretation of the verses of the Book of God – his name is

majestic – and the reason for that is due to his culture and his
diligence in the fundamentals, philosophy, logic, theology, and history
And jurisprudence, which made him a superior scientific ability in
research and scrutiny.
It seems that Sayyid al-Tabataba’i was one of those who said to
facilitate grammar, that is, to rid grammar of the impurities attached
to it, such as the theory of the worker, the saying of the second and
third causes, and other issues of grammatical facilitation that he
believed in, and called by a group of scholars in the past century.
And he used to quote some scholars’ sayings – which correspond to
the context according to his view as a mujtahid – such as al-Furra, alZamakhshari, and al-Tabarsi, for example, and sometimes he acted in
the phrase a slight act according to what the situation required.
Sayyid Tabatabai used to confuse the syntactic meaning with the
interpretive meaning, so that the researcher imagined at first glance
that he meant the expository meaning without the syntactic meaning,
and the reason for this may be due to the brevity without going into
detail.
Sayyid al-Tabatabai did not cite the hadiths of the Prophet – may
God’s prayers and peace be upon him and his family – in the field of
grammar, and neglected that with the knowledge that the Prophet –
may God’s prayers and peace be upon him and his family – had
reached the point of perfection. Because he is a pure Arab first, and
secondly, that God, may He be glorified and exalted, described him as
not uttering whims and desires, in agreement with that of the many
class of scholars who refused to cite the hadith on the pretext that the
hadith is narrated by meaning, and that most of its narrators are nonArabs..
And he was free from the opinions of the two schools in the sense
that he was not inclined to a particular doctrine in his views. He may

favor an opinion of the visionaries, and he does not intend to bias the
visionaries. Likewise, he may favor an opinion of the Kufians, and he
is not intended to advocate for the Kufians, but rather he favors an
opinion that is in harmony with the opinion he is convinced of.
An example of this is that in one of his preferences he preferred that
(from) is to be excised. Because he followed what is well-known
among grammarians, and expressed his preponderance by stating his
precursor from the context, and weakening the opinion that (from) is
an excess in the noble verse by saying: An increase (of) in the
affirmative is not proven, and it is a weak opinion. Because (who)
increases if it is an object of negation, preceded by a denial or a
prohibition, and does not increase in proven speech, and its merit is
knowledge, and it seems clear that Sayyid al-Tabatabai in this
grammatical rule is influenced by the opinion of the majority of
grammarians that he is in other grammatical issues he did not take
their opinion, for example The prefixed sentence that occurs
immediately is not required to be preceded by (may), unlike the
majority of grammarians.
Sayyid Tabatabai was not influenced by the famous grammatical
views. He may reject the well-known opinion agreed upon by most of
the grammarians and commentators, and take the unpopular opinion
based on all of this on the context and denominator significance.