النقد التفسيري عند الشيخ الطوسي (ت: 460هــ) في كتابه التبيان في تفسير القرآن عرض وتحليل

Exegetical criticism of Sheikh Al-Tusi (d.: 460 AH) in his book Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an View and analyze

Abstract
The study focused on clarifying the critical vision of Sheikh Al-Tusi in his criticism and refutation of the opposing interpretive views, and his criticism of these views in a scientific manner and a rational approach based on his opinion with evidence, arguments, and correct and strong evidence
The aim of the study was to demonstrate the epistemological position of Sheikh Al-Tusi and also the scientific value of interpretation, which the Sheikh practiced aspects of criticism, taking it as an effective tool in criticism and correction of opinions
One of the other objectives that this study clarifies is the critical methodology of Sheikh al-Tusi, and what are the methods and methods used by him in his criticism of these views in order for the Qur’anic image to be clear in its features
Can these critical methods and methods be taken as a tool in refuting, refuting, removing suspicions and removing problems?
Are there sources that the Sheikh has adopted in criticism and refutation with reference to some of the commentators and certain seers? The study included four chapters, each with its own topics
The first chapter dealt with three topics, methodology, and features, and the third topic studied the sources of interpretation criticism (Quran, Novel, Reason, Language, Rhetoric, and Consensus
The second chapter showed criticism in the significance of the verses of the rulings. It included various issues in clarifying the methods and the method of criticism of the Sheikh so that the first would be worshipers, the second in transactions, the third included limits, and the fourth was in blood money.
In the third chapter, the study included the topics of Quranic sciences and identified them with six topics.
As for the fourth chapter, the researcher studied the most important doctrinal issues and put them on the table of research, with the study of the most important parties to whom explanatory criticism was directed and who were infidels, dealing with (atheists), Jews and Christians (who have a book) and Muslims of their various sects.
The researcher obtained a number of results, namely that the sources approved by the Sheikh in his criticism are recognized sources, such as the Qur’an, the noble hadiths, and the sayings of trusted and distinguished scholars, in addition to the fact that the goal of
the Sheikh’s criticism of the sayings is because they are not reliable and have been