بطلان القاعدة الدستورية (دراسـة مـقـارنـة)

Nullity Of the Constitutional Rule (a comparative study)

The importance of the nullity theory increases when we know that the historical philosophical studies that show us that previous peoples did not benefit from their previous mistakes, nor from the lessons that history provided to them, but rather they repeat the same mistakes in the field of constitutional law. In addition, most constitutions transcend a basic and important principle, which is the extent to which the constitutional principles that these constitutions came with agree with international principles and agreements that serve as official sources for constitutions, and transcend the internal and external custom of the country and transcend the constitutional precedents that the constitutional law approaches, forgetting all of them to come up with a null and contrary constitutional rule. It does not meet the aspirations of the people nor the harmony of constitutional reality, and here the constitution has violated the recognized system of constitutional legality, and has gone out of its scope, whether it is internal or international, and here it will result in consequences that are very difficult to avoid because these consequences will be based on a constitutional rule, and the constitution is The pyramid of laws, and here arises our need for constitutional nullity in order to get rid of this legal cycle, and although nullity will face difficulty in avoiding it, it is not impossible. The case of invalidity includes degrees and ranks and contains images, types, effects and influences that dominate the constitutional base in order for the truth to emerge in it. Here, in order to understand the topic, the research will be divided into three chapters, in which we will discuss its specifics, and the first chapter will be the sources of the constitutional rule.