شعر عَمْرو بن كلثوم في الدراسات القديمة والحديثة

Rp- Amro Bin Kelthoum Between his Old and Modern Studiers .pdf

All praise is due to God, creator of the creation, granting good, praise suits His dignity as he must be praised, Prayer and peace be upon our master and prophet Mohammed and his progeny, the light of right guidance whom God removed all impurity from them and to make them completely pure.
It is undoubtedly that criticism is accompanied to literature concerning establishment through eras. Both of them are interested with flair and beauty, and both in turn are standing on the influence by the described, motivation, organizing the connected expressions that express this influence by the described. The poet is influenced by things when he describes them; then, he makes a process of evaluation to be harmonious and sounds expressing his emotions and this is what is called by criticism.
The modern critical ideology does not find a difficulty in dealing with the old poetic texts because criticism and literature are two sides for one coin due to their inherence rather than decomposition. Tis is to what a human message and emotional practices these old texts represent that reflect the real situation of the reform owner which express himself and his society and make imaging and documenting talen for the historical, social, and political events which in turn form the external context of the poet’s life.
Hence, the topic acquired its significance from the significance of the old Arabic literature as the Arab collection that keep their deeds and works. It is the main conveyer to their culture and life. Thus, it is necessary to rethink of old literature and read it with sufficient critical reading that rely on the old critical ideology and distinguish it from the modern one in a way to emerge change features, renewal and development merits in Arabic literature.
Amro Bin Kelthoum Al Teghlibi is considered one of the well- known pre- Islamic poet and one of the famous hangings. He had a published collection that evoked many critical reactions. Therefore, many old and contemporary studiers started tackling his study committing on his verse and his poetic language.
Due to my great desire to study pre- Islamic literature and due to my interest to literature of this era, Dr. Ali Dheyab Muhyi Al Ibadi suggested the research title as a serious and valid for the study for it is a phenomenon in Arabic literature including all its weak and good points.
The study included introduction, preface, three chapters, and conclusion, beside a list of references and bibliographies. The preface was devoted to study the poet’s life and what is said about his name, origin, birth, growth, religion, family, death, his social, political, and cultural era, verse, and collection.
The first chapter treated the old critics’ stand towards the poet and his poetic language; it has three sections. The first section mentioned his poetic class and prestige. The second section stated what was said about his verse and arts. The third section discussed the linguistic and prosody phenomena in his verse.
The second chapter was devoted for studying the stand on the old critics about his verse. It has three sections. The first section treated the poetic plagiarisms. The second section was about the rhetorical phenomena in his verse. The third section studied nature and pretense in his verse.
The third chapter tackled the critical orientations in his verse. It has two sections. The first section was devoted to the traditional approaches while the second section was about the modern approaches. This was followed by conclusion that abbreviated the important aspect of the study and the most important results. Then, the study ended with a list of the most important references and bibliographies that varied into the old and modern literary studies, the historical studies that cared about aspects of the verse of Amro Bin Kelthoum Al Teghlibi. Beside a number of university theses, dissertations, and researches spread in the local Arabic periodicals.
The study adopted the analytical approach. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Ali Dheyab Muhyi Al Ibadi who supervised on my study, granted me scientific information as well as his high interest to my study. Therefore, I highly appreciated and respect him.
I have ambition that my study be a search for such studies through analysis, criticism, and discussion and to have its place in the literary studies in our rich library beside the brilliant useful publications. At the end, I don’t claim perfection for my work or I gave the study its right, rather, if I was right, this is due to Allah favor. If I am mistaken, this belongs to me. And the conclusion of our prayer will be” All type of perfect and true praise belongs to Allah the Lord of the world