تَوظِيفُ الشَاهِدِ القُرآنِيِّ فِي الجُهْدِ التَفسِيرِيّ النَّحْوِيِّ عِندَ سِيبَوَيه (ت180هـ)

The use of the Qur’anic evidence in Sibawayh’s (d. 180 AH) grammatical interpretive effort

summary
This study tagged with (the Qur’anic witness and his employment in the interpretive effort when Sibawayh (d 180 AH)) came to show Sibawayh’s dependence on the Qur’anic witness, and how he employed him in the chapters of his book, as well as to show the extent of the impact of that employment in the interpretive effort when Sibawayh, and accordingly the study was divided on:
Introduction: It includes a definition of the terms contained in the title language and idiomatically (witness, interpretation, Quranic witness, the importance of the Qur’anic witness for grammarians and Sibawayh, definition of Sibawayh and his book and the importance of the book with mention of its most important explanations)
Chapter I: It contained three sections in which Sibawayh’s approach was searched for in his book in the first section, while the second studied the value of martyrdom when Sibawayh, followed by the third section, which contains a statistic of Quranic evidence and analysis of it according to what Sibawayh employed in his book.
The second chapter: included three sections dealt with the employment of the Quranic witness in the interpretive effort in matters of speech, the first section studied employment in nominal structures, while the second studied employment in the actual structures and concluded the chapter with the third section, which studied employment in letters.
And the third chapter: included three sections also showed the employment of the Quranic witness in the explanatory effort in some Arabic methods, the first section between employment in the method of penalty (condition), between the second employment in the method of exception, and the tail of the chapter of the third section, which showed employment methods of demand such as interrogative, command and prohibition.
The thesis concluded with a conclusion that included the most important findings of the research, including:
That Sibawayh was not his main task in his book is to establish the grammatical base or what is known as (workmanship) as it is one of the things that may be known to everyone, but the task of Sibawayh in his book is an explanatory task any – interpretation of the words of the Arabs – or – how the Arabs spoke – and then shows the significance of any grammatical structure spoken by the Arabs, and on that we find him asking Hebron, may God have mercy on him, about the interpretation of some linguistic phenomena, and the Quranic witness only to support what he goes to Sibawayh in his interpretive adoptions, as Sibawayh did not follow the interpretive approach followed by the interpreters of the Qur’an, but took it in another direction, which is the interpretation of the words of the Arabs and supporting it with what was stated in the Qur’an being the highest rank speech.